Useful Tips from Google ...

... for their paying customers.

CNN may need to up their game.

Time comes on strong.

A Gentleman's Honor

Glass.

Bonus, some unprepared piano, by Nils Frahm.

A true micro-aggression.

Against the gas can.

Fake News, Book Edition -- Update

Here.

Tweeting as an art form

Here.

CNN's true colors

CNN is despicable.

CNN now says they kept his identity a secret for his safety. But they only know it because they hunted him down. There would be no issue of exposure had they not decided to find him out. Nice anonymity you got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it.

More from Althouse.

UPDATE. CNN responds:  He was not underage!!
Fake news getting you down? Perhaps you want a retraction?

UPDATER: Here is a timeline with the CNN guy changing his story repeatedly in an attempt to obfuscate his threats.

UPDATERER: The gift that keeps on giving.

And giving. The fake news just keeps coming. and this really is fake news not just an error. Innocent errors would be random. The fake Lincoln quote too.  And the carefully edited handshake video in Poland, made to look like a snub of Trump, was reated by CNN reporters. Cilizza in particular.

RELATED. Not just CNN. Note the dates, long after the AP retraction, the NYT retraction, and the testimony of the DNI that the 17 number was bogus. It's not just an error. She is controverting Trump's assertion without bothering to check.

Fake News, Book Edition

The new book Truth in Chains is challenged. A quiet but devastating review is here.

More Melnyk

Cloud 81

How's Trump Doing?

By the platform, zero out of five. 21 May 2017.

Conceptual

penis

Coyne has a few follow up posts on this too. Here.

Four Saints in Three Acts

A new recording! From the excellent BMOP!

Slate Star Codex

Destroys the "Trump is a racist" meme.

Sunstein, I salute you

Cass Sunstein, on fighting groupthink.

A little Lekeu

Lekeu was 21 in 1891. He died three years later.

NBC on the job!

Here.

Should voters be allowed to pick Mary Ann?

There is a clear division between those who would pick Ginger and those who would pick Mary Ann. In most polls Mary Ann wins. But this is problematic. Are voters making a rational choice? Mary Ann voters describe her as more stable, low-maintenance, kind. Ginger on the other hand is described as manipulative, selfish, demanding. But these are illusions. After all, we know nothing about either except what they look and sound like. They are fictional roles played by actresses.The highly educated should be able to see this. And indeed they favour Ginger. Ginger, most agree, gives off more signs of female arousal. This might explain why Ginger polls better with the young, especially 17 year old boys. And Scots prefer Ginger, perhaps due to her colouring. So then: the highly educated, the adolescents, and the Scots favour Ginger.
My question is, should people be allowed to pick Mary Ann?